↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Treatment including anthracyclines versus treatment not including anthracyclines for childhood cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
Title
Treatment including anthracyclines versus treatment not including anthracyclines for childhood cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006647.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elvira C van Dalen, Martine F Raphaël, Huib N Caron, Leontien CM Kremer

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 140 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 15%
Researcher 19 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Other 9 6%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 27 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Psychology 6 4%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 36 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2015.
All research outputs
#1,076,202
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,222
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,606
of 201,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#79
of 215 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 215 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.