The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Vitrification versus slow freezing for women undergoing oocyte cryopreservation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010047.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Demián Glujovsky, Barbara Riestra, Carlos Sueldo, Gabriel Fiszbajn, Sjoerd Repping, Florencia Nodar, Sergio Papier, Agustín Ciapponi |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 203 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 35 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 15% |
| Researcher | 25 | 12% |
| Other | 15 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 12% |
| Unknown | 63 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 63 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 10% |
| Unknown | 70 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,953,904
of 26,370,291 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,994
of 13,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,399
of 250,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#70
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,370,291 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.