↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Combined calcium, magnesium and potassium supplementation for the management of primary hypertension in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Combined calcium, magnesium and potassium supplementation for the management of primary hypertension in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2006
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004805.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fiona R Beyer, Heather O Dickinson, Donald Nicolson, Gary A Ford, James Mason

Abstract

Previous research suggests that increasing dietary intakes of calcium, potassium or magnesium separately may reduce BP to a small degree over the short term. It is unclear whether increasing intakes of a combination of these minerals produces a larger reduction in BP.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
Unknown 149 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 21%
Student > Bachelor 23 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 7%
Researcher 8 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 3%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 54 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 5%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 58 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2021.
All research outputs
#6,022,718
of 20,370,630 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,069
of 12,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,654
of 214,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#167
of 216 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,370,630 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 216 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.