↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Glutamine supplementation for critically ill adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
270 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Glutamine supplementation for critically ill adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010050.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kun-Ming Tao, Xiao-Qian Li, Li-Qun Yang, Wei-Feng Yu, Zhi-Jie Lu, Yu-Ming Sun, Fei-Xiang Wu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 267 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 16%
Student > Bachelor 34 13%
Researcher 30 11%
Other 24 9%
Student > Postgraduate 19 7%
Other 63 23%
Unknown 56 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 100 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 14%
Unspecified 10 4%
Psychology 9 3%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Other 36 13%
Unknown 70 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,750,666
of 21,044,876 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,039
of 12,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,904
of 216,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#67
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,044,876 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,071 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.