↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Glutamine supplementation for critically ill adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
231 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Glutamine supplementation for critically ill adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010050.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kun-Ming Tao, Xiao-Qian Li, Li-Qun Yang, Wei-Feng Yu, Zhi-Jie Lu, Yu-Ming Sun, Fei-Xiang Wu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 228 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 20%
Researcher 29 13%
Student > Bachelor 28 12%
Other 22 10%
Student > Postgraduate 17 7%
Other 52 23%
Unknown 37 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 94 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 39 17%
Psychology 9 4%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Other 27 12%
Unknown 47 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2020.
All research outputs
#1,505,914
of 17,411,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,757
of 11,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,756
of 209,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#74
of 220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,411,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,670 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.