↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Minimally invasive discectomy versus microdiscectomy/open discectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
197 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
400 Mendeley
Title
Minimally invasive discectomy versus microdiscectomy/open discectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010328.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohammad R Rasouli, Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar, Farhad Shokraneh, Maziar Moradi-Lakeh, Roger Chou

Abstract

Microdiscectomy or open discectomy (MD/OD) are the standard procedures for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation and they involve removal of the portion of the intervertebral disc compressing the nerve root or spinal cord (or both) with or without the aid of a headlight loupe or microscope magnification. Potential advantages of newer minimally invasive discectomy (MID) procedures over standard MD/OD include less blood loss, less postoperative pain, shorter hospitalisation and earlier return to work.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 400 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Unknown 394 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 55 14%
Student > Master 52 13%
Researcher 49 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 9%
Student > Postgraduate 26 7%
Other 76 19%
Unknown 108 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 154 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 40 10%
Neuroscience 12 3%
Psychology 11 3%
Sports and Recreations 8 2%
Other 48 12%
Unknown 127 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2023.
All research outputs
#4,275,503
of 23,743,910 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,824
of 12,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,930
of 239,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#132
of 231 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,743,910 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,753 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.5. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 231 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.