| Title |
Educational outreach visits: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000409.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mary Ann O'Brien, Stephen Rogers, Gro Jamtvedt, Andrew Oxman, Jan Odgaard-Jensen, Doris Tove Kristoffersen, Louise Forsetlund, Daryl Bainbridge, Nick Freemantle, Dave Davis, R. Brian Haynes, Emma Harvey |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 641 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 1% |
| Australia | 4 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Kenya | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 11 | 2% |
| Unknown | 594 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 118 | 18% |
| Researcher | 107 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 99 | 15% |
| Other | 39 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 34 | 5% |
| Other | 149 | 23% |
| Unknown | 95 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 262 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 62 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 51 | 8% |
| Psychology | 49 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 14 | 2% |
| Other | 80 | 12% |
| Unknown | 123 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,088,141
of 23,314,015 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,441
of 12,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,004
of 76,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,314,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,495 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.