↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Effectiveness of different treatment modalities for the management of adult‐onset granulosa cell tumours of the ovary (primary and recurrent)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
218 Mendeley
Title
Effectiveness of different treatment modalities for the management of adult‐onset granulosa cell tumours of the ovary (primary and recurrent)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006912.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mahalakshmi Gurumurthy, Andrew Bryant, Smruta Shanbhag

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 218 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 13%
Student > Bachelor 23 11%
Researcher 14 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 6%
Unspecified 13 6%
Other 55 25%
Unknown 70 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 10%
Unspecified 13 6%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Psychology 6 3%
Other 20 9%
Unknown 77 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2019.
All research outputs
#3,660,444
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,321
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,851
of 243,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#110
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.