| Title |
Self‐management education for cystic fibrosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007641.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eileen Savage, Paul V Beirne, Muireann Ni Chroinin, Alistair Duff, Tony Fitzgerald, Dawn Farrell |
| Abstract |
Self-management education may help patients with cystic fibrosis and their families to choose, monitor and adjust treatment requirements for their illness, and also to manage the effects of illness on their lives. Although self-management education interventions have been developed for cystic fibrosis, no previous systematic review of the evidence of effectiveness of these interventions has been conducted. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 357 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 352 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 60 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 38 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 10% |
| Researcher | 28 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 20 | 6% |
| Other | 70 | 20% |
| Unknown | 104 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 82 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 61 | 17% |
| Psychology | 20 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 46 | 13% |
| Unknown | 121 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2014.
All research outputs
#15,799,182
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,126
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,013
of 250,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#200
of 218 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 218 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.