↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Self-management education for cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
269 Mendeley
Title
Self-management education for cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007641.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eileen Savage, Paul V Beirne, Muireann Ni Chroinin, Alistair Duff, Tony Fitzgerald, Dawn Farrell

Abstract

Self-management education may help patients with cystic fibrosis and their families to choose, monitor and adjust treatment requirements for their illness, and also to manage the effects of illness on their lives. Although self-management education interventions have been developed for cystic fibrosis, no previous systematic review of the evidence of effectiveness of these interventions has been conducted.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 269 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 264 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 54 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 13%
Student > Bachelor 34 13%
Researcher 25 9%
Student > Postgraduate 20 7%
Other 54 20%
Unknown 47 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 77 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 49 18%
Social Sciences 19 7%
Psychology 17 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 3%
Other 42 16%
Unknown 58 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2014.
All research outputs
#7,070,192
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,460
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,013
of 202,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#181
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.