| Title |
Anticonvulsant therapy for status epilepticus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003723.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Manya Prasad, Pudukode R Krishnan, Reginald Sequeira, Khaldoon Al‐Roomi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 15 | 27% |
| United States | 4 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 7% |
| Mexico | 2 | 4% |
| Argentina | 2 | 4% |
| Turkey | 1 | 2% |
| Grenada | 1 | 2% |
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 18 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 41 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 18% |
| Scientists | 3 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 295 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 286 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 41 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 12% |
| Other | 27 | 9% |
| Researcher | 26 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 25 | 8% |
| Other | 53 | 18% |
| Unknown | 89 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 127 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 28 | 9% |
| Unknown | 95 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2023.
All research outputs
#923,728
of 26,154,283 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,685
of 13,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,029
of 251,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#27
of 230 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,154,283 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 230 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.