↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Pre-hospital versus in-hospital thrombolysis for ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
11 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
218 Mendeley
Title
Pre-hospital versus in-hospital thrombolysis for ST-elevation myocardial infarction
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010191.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael McCaul, Andrit Lourens, Tamara Kredo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 217 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 35 16%
Student > Master 33 15%
Researcher 26 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 8%
Student > Postgraduate 13 6%
Other 39 18%
Unknown 54 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 43 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Psychology 7 3%
Other 25 11%
Unknown 63 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,861,655
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,128
of 12,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,848
of 239,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#74
of 227 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,331 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 227 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.