↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Pre‐hospital versus in‐hospital thrombolysis for ST‐elevation myocardial infarction

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
10 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
259 Mendeley
Title
Pre‐hospital versus in‐hospital thrombolysis for ST‐elevation myocardial infarction
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010191.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael McCaul, Andrit Lourens, Tamara Kredo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 259 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 258 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 37 14%
Student > Master 36 14%
Researcher 27 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 8%
Other 15 6%
Other 42 16%
Unknown 80 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 44 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 3%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Other 29 11%
Unknown 91 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2021.
All research outputs
#2,275,556
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,663
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,190
of 251,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#81
of 230 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 230 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.