↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Surgery for lateral elbow pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Surgery for lateral elbow pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003525.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachelle Buchbinder, Renea V Johnston, Les Barnsley, Willem JJ Assendelft, Simon N Bell, Nynke Smidt

Abstract

Surgery is sometimes recommended for persistent lateral elbow pain where other less invasive interventions have failed.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 205 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 22%
Student > Bachelor 31 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 11%
Other 18 9%
Researcher 16 8%
Other 40 19%
Unknown 35 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 92 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 16%
Sports and Recreations 9 4%
Psychology 8 4%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Other 20 10%
Unknown 41 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2019.
All research outputs
#6,407,124
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,219
of 12,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,121
of 108,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#53
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,184 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.