↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Surgery for lateral elbow pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Surgery for lateral elbow pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003525.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachelle Buchbinder, Renea V Johnston, Les Barnsley, Willem JJ Assendelft, Simon N Bell, Nynke Smidt

Abstract

Surgery is sometimes recommended for persistent lateral elbow pain where other less invasive interventions have failed.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 184 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 24%
Student > Bachelor 26 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 11%
Researcher 16 9%
Other 16 9%
Other 32 17%
Unknown 32 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 81 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 16%
Psychology 8 4%
Sports and Recreations 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 39 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2019.
All research outputs
#4,289,049
of 15,641,077 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,920
of 11,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,361
of 204,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#162
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,641,077 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,228 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.3. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,495 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.