↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Antidepressant treatment for postnatal depression

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
45 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
453 Mendeley
Title
Antidepressant treatment for postnatal depression
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002018.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emma Molyneaux, Louise M Howard, Helen R McGeown, Amar M Karia, Kylee Trevillion

Abstract

Postnatal depression is a common disorder that can have adverse short- and long-term effects on maternal morbidity, the new infant and the family as a whole. Treatment is often largely by social support and psychological interventions. It is not known whether antidepressants are an effective and safe choice for treatment of this disorder. This review was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of different antidepressants and to compare their effectiveness with other forms of treatment, placebo or treatment as usual. It is an update of a review first published in 2001.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 453 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 449 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 79 17%
Student > Bachelor 61 13%
Researcher 51 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 8%
Other 27 6%
Other 84 19%
Unknown 117 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 122 27%
Psychology 71 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 49 11%
Social Sciences 19 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 3%
Other 49 11%
Unknown 130 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2023.
All research outputs
#507,806
of 25,380,089 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#905
of 12,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,860
of 250,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 206 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,380,089 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,310 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 206 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.