↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Rapid viral diagnosis for acute febrile respiratory illness in children in the Emergency Department

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
23 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
220 Mendeley
Title
Rapid viral diagnosis for acute febrile respiratory illness in children in the Emergency Department
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006452.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Quynh Doan, Paul Enarson, Niranjan Kissoon, Terry P Klassen, David W Johnson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 217 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 20%
Researcher 32 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 11%
Student > Bachelor 25 11%
Other 16 7%
Other 43 20%
Unknown 34 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 95 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 5%
Social Sciences 9 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 3%
Other 24 11%
Unknown 51 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,215,434
of 17,358,590 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,153
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,182
of 209,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#62
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,358,590 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.