| Title |
Rapid viral diagnosis for acute febrile respiratory illness in children in the Emergency Department
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006452.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Quynh Doan, Paul Enarson, Niranjan Kissoon, Terry P Klassen, David W Johnson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 15% |
| Spain | 2 | 10% |
| Greece | 1 | 5% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 15% |
| Scientists | 2 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 312 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 309 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 51 | 16% |
| Researcher | 31 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 9% |
| Other | 23 | 7% |
| Other | 62 | 20% |
| Unknown | 87 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 112 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Psychology | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 31 | 10% |
| Unknown | 110 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,740,465
of 24,907,378 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,825
of 13,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,367
of 252,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#65
of 225 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,907,378 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,005 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 225 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.