↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Rapid viral diagnosis for acute febrile respiratory illness in children in the Emergency Department

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
20 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
277 Mendeley
Title
Rapid viral diagnosis for acute febrile respiratory illness in children in the Emergency Department
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006452.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Quynh Doan, Paul Enarson, Niranjan Kissoon, Terry P Klassen, David W Johnson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 277 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 274 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 18%
Researcher 31 11%
Student > Bachelor 30 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 9%
Other 17 6%
Other 54 19%
Unknown 68 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 102 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 4%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 3%
Other 31 11%
Unknown 87 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2021.
All research outputs
#1,623,090
of 21,392,919 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,763
of 12,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,201
of 217,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#63
of 211 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,392,919 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,045 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 211 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.