↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Steroid avoidance or withdrawal for pancreas and pancreas with kidney transplant recipients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
241 Mendeley
Title
Steroid avoidance or withdrawal for pancreas and pancreas with kidney transplant recipients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007669.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nuria Montero, Angela C Webster, Ana Royuela, Javier Zamora, Marta Crespo Barrio, Julio Pascual

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 241 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 240 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 10%
Student > Bachelor 24 10%
Researcher 21 9%
Other 19 8%
Other 47 20%
Unknown 68 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 95 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 9%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 3%
Psychology 6 2%
Other 22 9%
Unknown 81 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2019.
All research outputs
#6,971,365
of 26,032,395 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,384
of 13,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,495
of 259,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#156
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,032,395 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,180 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,906 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.