| Title |
Oral or transdermal opioids for osteoarthritis of the knee or hip
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003115.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bruno R da Costa, Eveline Nüesch, Rahel Kasteler, Elaine Husni, Vivian Welch, Anne WS Rutjes, Peter Jüni |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 15 | 39% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| Saint Barthélemy | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 82% |
| Scientists | 3 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 325 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 322 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 48 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 12% |
| Researcher | 35 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 7% |
| Other | 46 | 14% |
| Unknown | 102 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 117 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 19 | 6% |
| Psychology | 14 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 3% |
| Other | 34 | 10% |
| Unknown | 107 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,067,413
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,130
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,933
of 260,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#36
of 229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.