↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for panic disorder in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
207 Mendeley
Title
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for panic disorder in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009083.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hui Li, Jijun Wang, Chunbo Li, Zeping Xiao

Abstract

Panic disorder (PD) is a common type of anxiety disorder, characterized by unexpected and repeated panic attacks or fear of future panic attacks, or both. Individuals with PD are often resistant to pharmacological or psychological treatments and this can lead to the disorder becoming a chronic and disabling illness. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can deliver sustained and spatially selective current to suppress or induce cortical excitability, and its therapeutic effect on pathological neuronal activity in people with PD has already been examined in case studies and clinical trials. However, a systematic review is necessary to assess the efficacy and safety of rTMS for PD.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 204 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 17%
Researcher 30 14%
Student > Bachelor 26 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 9%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 45 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 29%
Psychology 34 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 6%
Neuroscience 10 5%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Other 30 14%
Unknown 53 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2019.
All research outputs
#3,382,858
of 17,053,340 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,122
of 11,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,544
of 214,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#132
of 218 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,053,340 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.6. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,595 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 218 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.