↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Mesh fixation techniques for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Mesh fixation techniques for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008954.pub2
Authors

Ajay Gupta, Fayyaz Mazari, Nehemiah Samuel, Srinivasan Balchandra

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 16%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 5 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 47%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2017.
All research outputs
#7,188,527
of 12,100,779 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,396
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,689
of 272,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#67
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,100,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,323 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.