↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Escitalopram versus other antidepressive agents for depression

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 tweeters
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
141 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
319 Mendeley
Title
Escitalopram versus other antidepressive agents for depression
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006532.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea Cipriani, Claudio Santilli, Toshi A Furukawa, Alessandra Signoretti, Atsuo Nakagawa, Hugh McGuire, Rachel Churchill, Corrado Barbui

Abstract

Although pharmacological and psychological interventions are both effective for major depression, antidepressant drugs remain the mainstay of treatment in primary and secondary care settings. During the last 20 years, antidepressant prescribing has risen dramatically in western countries, mainly because of the increasing consumption of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and newer antidepressants, which have progressively become the most commonly prescribed antidepressants. Escitalopram is the pure S-enantiomer of the racemic citalopram.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 319 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 305 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 57 18%
Researcher 44 14%
Student > Bachelor 42 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 7%
Other 71 22%
Unknown 50 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 132 41%
Psychology 41 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 19 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 4%
Other 43 13%
Unknown 57 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2015.
All research outputs
#1,072,395
of 12,101,174 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,556
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,911
of 217,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#68
of 190 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,101,174 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 190 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.