↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Codeine, alone and with paracetamol (acetaminophen), for cancer pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
44 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
193 Mendeley
Title
Codeine, alone and with paracetamol (acetaminophen), for cancer pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006601.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carmen Straube, Sheena Derry, Kenneth C Jackson, Philip J Wiffen, Rae Frances Bell, Scott Strassels, Sebastian Straube

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 190 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 15%
Researcher 25 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 10%
Student > Postgraduate 16 8%
Student > Bachelor 16 8%
Other 34 18%
Unknown 54 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 13%
Psychology 9 5%
Chemistry 6 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 60 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2016.
All research outputs
#936,118
of 22,362,047 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,084
of 12,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,412
of 225,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#34
of 209 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,362,047 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 209 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.