↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Clinical pathways for chronic cough in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
Title
Clinical pathways for chronic cough in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006595.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gabrielle B McCallum, Emily J Bailey, Peter S Morris, Anne B Chang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 144 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 16%
Student > Master 22 15%
Researcher 17 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Other 37 25%
Unknown 23 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 15%
Psychology 8 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 5%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 30 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,526,490
of 15,968,783 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,933
of 11,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,466
of 211,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#87
of 216 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,968,783 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,344 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 216 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.