↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Symptomatic treatment of the cough in whooping cough

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
265 Mendeley
Title
Symptomatic treatment of the cough in whooping cough
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003257.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kay Wang, Silvana Bettiol, Matthew J Thompson, Nia W Roberts, Rafael Perera, Carl J Heneghan, Anthony Harnden

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 261 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 15%
Student > Bachelor 33 12%
Researcher 26 10%
Other 21 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 6%
Other 55 21%
Unknown 72 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 94 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Other 29 11%
Unknown 81 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2020.
All research outputs
#4,230,063
of 21,321,525 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,689
of 12,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,179
of 224,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#132
of 211 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,321,525 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,039 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.0. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 211 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.