↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Symptomatic treatment of the cough in whooping cough

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
330 Mendeley
Title
Symptomatic treatment of the cough in whooping cough
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003257.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kay Wang, Silvana Bettiol, Matthew J Thompson, Nia W Roberts, Rafael Perera, Carl J Heneghan, Anthony Harnden

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 330 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 326 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 14%
Student > Bachelor 34 10%
Researcher 30 9%
Other 24 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 6%
Other 57 17%
Unknown 118 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 105 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 17 5%
Social Sciences 6 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Other 29 9%
Unknown 131 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2024.
All research outputs
#6,636,906
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,237
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,866
of 263,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#148
of 222 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 222 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.