↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Symptomatic treatment of the cough in whooping cough

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
206 Mendeley
Title
Symptomatic treatment of the cough in whooping cough
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003257.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kay Wang, Silvana Bettiol, Matthew J Thompson, Nia W Roberts, Rafael Perera, Carl J Heneghan, Anthony Harnden

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 202 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 18%
Researcher 28 14%
Student > Bachelor 28 14%
Other 20 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 9%
Other 42 20%
Unknown 31 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 86 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 17 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Other 24 12%
Unknown 41 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2015.
All research outputs
#2,272,990
of 12,980,013 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,108
of 10,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,162
of 209,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#129
of 218 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,980,013 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,427 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 218 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.