↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intravenous immunoglobulin for Guillain‐Barré syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
42 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
348 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
636 Mendeley
Title
Intravenous immunoglobulin for Guillain‐Barré syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002063.pub6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard AC Hughes, Anthony V Swan, Pieter A van Doorn

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 636 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Fiji 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Unknown 625 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 88 14%
Student > Master 82 13%
Researcher 69 11%
Other 61 10%
Student > Postgraduate 59 9%
Other 114 18%
Unknown 163 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 242 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 45 7%
Neuroscience 38 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 27 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 3%
Other 76 12%
Unknown 187 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 371. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2023.
All research outputs
#90,113
of 26,503,275 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#163
of 13,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#718
of 261,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2
of 223 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,503,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,239 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 223 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.