↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Centre-based day care for children younger than five years of age in low- and middle-income countries

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
281 Mendeley
Title
Centre-based day care for children younger than five years of age in low- and middle-income countries
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010543.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Taylor W Brown, Felix C van Urk, Rebecca Waller, Evan Mayo-Wilson

Abstract

Because of poverty, children and families in low- and middle-income countries often face significant impediments to health and well-being. Centre-based day care services may influence the development of children and the economic situation of parents by providing good quality early childhood care and by freeing parents to participate in the labour force.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 281 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 276 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 16%
Student > Master 44 16%
Researcher 42 15%
Student > Bachelor 30 11%
Student > Postgraduate 17 6%
Other 54 19%
Unknown 49 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 47 17%
Social Sciences 32 11%
Psychology 31 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9 3%
Other 42 15%
Unknown 62 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2014.
All research outputs
#10,024,039
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,663
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,768
of 211,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#203
of 217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.