| Title |
Centre-based day care for children younger than five years of age in low- and middle-income countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010543.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Taylor W Brown, Felix C van Urk, Rebecca Waller, Evan Mayo-Wilson |
| Abstract |
Because of poverty, children and families in low- and middle-income countries often face significant impediments to health and well-being. Centre-based day care services may influence the development of children and the economic situation of parents by providing good quality early childhood care and by freeing parents to participate in the labour force. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 359 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 353 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 53 | 15% |
| Researcher | 48 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 48 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 21 | 6% |
| Other | 59 | 16% |
| Unknown | 96 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 65 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 51 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 39 | 11% |
| Psychology | 32 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 4% |
| Other | 49 | 14% |
| Unknown | 110 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2021.
All research outputs
#6,780,313
of 22,765,347 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,441
of 12,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,574
of 252,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#170
of 218 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,765,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 218 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.