↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Centre-based day care for children younger than five years of age in low- and middle-income countries

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
323 Mendeley
Title
Centre-based day care for children younger than five years of age in low- and middle-income countries
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010543.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Taylor W Brown, Felix C van Urk, Rebecca Waller, Evan Mayo-Wilson

Abstract

Because of poverty, children and families in low- and middle-income countries often face significant impediments to health and well-being. Centre-based day care services may influence the development of children and the economic situation of parents by providing good quality early childhood care and by freeing parents to participate in the labour force.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 323 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 318 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 16%
Researcher 45 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 13%
Student > Bachelor 35 11%
Student > Postgraduate 19 6%
Other 58 18%
Unknown 72 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 51 16%
Social Sciences 35 11%
Psychology 33 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 4%
Other 45 14%
Unknown 84 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2021.
All research outputs
#6,653,281
of 22,381,487 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,366
of 12,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,942
of 225,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#165
of 209 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,381,487 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 209 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.