↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Haloperidol versus chlorpromazine for schizophrenia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 tweeters
weibo
1 weibo user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
Title
Haloperidol versus chlorpromazine for schizophrenia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004278.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudia Leucht, Maria Kitzmantel, John Kane, Stefan Leucht, Wan Lian LC Chua

Abstract

Chlorpromazine and haloperidol are benchmark antipsychotic drugs. Both are said to be equally effective when used at equivalent doses, but have different side-effect profiles.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 106 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 10%
Student > Master 10 9%
Other 8 7%
Other 23 21%
Unknown 21 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 33%
Psychology 13 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 28 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2019.
All research outputs
#2,063,957
of 18,094,733 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,674
of 11,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,507
of 218,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#100
of 224 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,094,733 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,819 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 218,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 224 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.