↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Haloperidol versus chlorpromazine for schizophrenia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 tweeters
weibo
1 weibo user
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
Title
Haloperidol versus chlorpromazine for schizophrenia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004278.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudia Leucht, Maria Kitzmantel, John Kane, Stefan Leucht, Wan Lian LC Chua

Abstract

Chlorpromazine and haloperidol are benchmark antipsychotic drugs. Both are said to be equally effective when used at equivalent doses, but have different side-effect profiles.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 122 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 10%
Student > Master 9 7%
Other 8 6%
Other 22 18%
Unknown 34 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 34%
Psychology 13 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 39 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,445,524
of 21,399,109 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,084
of 12,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,752
of 224,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#98
of 216 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,399,109 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,048 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 216 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.