↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Omentoplasty for oesophagogastrostomy after oesophagectomy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
Title
Omentoplasty for oesophagogastrostomy after oesophagectomy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008446.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yong Yuan, Xiaoxi Zeng, Yang Hu, Tianpeng Xie, Yongfan Zhao

Abstract

Oesophagectomy followed by oesophagogastrostomy is the preferred treatment for early-stage oesophageal cancer. It carries the risk of anastomotic leakage after oesophagogastric anastomosis, which causes considerable morbidity and mortality and is one of the most dangerous complications. Omentoplasty has been recommended by some researchers to prevent anastomotic leaks associated with oesophagogastrostomy. However, the value of omentoplasty for oesophagogastrostomy after oesophagectomy has not been systematically reviewed.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Peru 1 1%
Unknown 96 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 21%
Researcher 12 12%
Other 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 20 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 29 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2015.
All research outputs
#3,403,315
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,934
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,356
of 211,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#159
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.