↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Down-titration and discontinuation strategies of tumor necrosis factor-blocking agents for rheumatoid arthritis in patients with low disease activity

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
Title
Down-titration and discontinuation strategies of tumor necrosis factor-blocking agents for rheumatoid arthritis in patients with low disease activity
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010455.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Noortje van Herwaarden, Alfons A den Broeder, Wilco Jacobs, Aatke van der Maas, Johannes WJ Bijlsma, Ronald F van Vollenhoven, Bartholomeus JF van den Bemt

Abstract

Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents are effective in treating patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but they are associated with (dose-dependent) adverse effects and high costs. To prevent overtreatment, several trials have assessed the effectiveness of down-titration compared with continuation of the standard dose.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Unknown 130 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 18%
Student > Master 18 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Other 27 20%
Unknown 18 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 53%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Psychology 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 27 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2018.
All research outputs
#2,921,524
of 22,811,321 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,608
of 12,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,209
of 252,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#106
of 224 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,811,321 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,317 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,661 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 224 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.