↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Dietary supplements for chronic gout

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Dietary supplements for chronic gout
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010156.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mariano Andrés, Francisca Sivera, Louise Falzon, Rachelle Buchbinder, Loreto Carmona

Abstract

Dietary supplements are frequently used for the treatment of several medical conditions, both prescribed by physicians or self administered. However, evidence of benefit and safety of these supplements is usually limited or absent.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 172 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 21%
Student > Bachelor 32 18%
Researcher 22 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 8%
Student > Postgraduate 13 7%
Other 37 21%
Unknown 21 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 6%
Psychology 9 5%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 28 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,486,772
of 17,726,748 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,717
of 11,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,449
of 219,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#76
of 233 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,726,748 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,371 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 233 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.