↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Dietary supplements for chronic gout

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Dietary supplements for chronic gout
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010156.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mariano Andrés, Francisca Sivera, Louise Falzon, Rachelle Buchbinder, Loreto Carmona

Abstract

Dietary supplements are frequently used for the treatment of several medical conditions, both prescribed by physicians or self administered. However, evidence of benefit and safety of these supplements is usually limited or absent.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 159 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 19%
Student > Bachelor 27 17%
Researcher 20 12%
Other 13 8%
Student > Postgraduate 13 8%
Other 31 19%
Unknown 27 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 6%
Social Sciences 9 6%
Psychology 8 5%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 34 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2016.
All research outputs
#2,352,568
of 21,321,698 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,935
of 12,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,156
of 226,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#99
of 227 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,321,698 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,038 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 227 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.