The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 112 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Influenza vaccines for preventing acute otitis media in infants and children
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2017
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010089.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mohd N Norhayati, Jacqueline J Ho, Mohd Y Azman |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 19 | 17% |
United States | 6 | 5% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 4% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 2% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
Sao Tome and Principe | 1 | <1% |
Austria | 1 | <1% |
Other | 3 | 3% |
Unknown | 73 | 65% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 99 | 88% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 9% |
Scientists | 2 | 2% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 266 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 47 | 18% |
Researcher | 24 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 23 | 9% |
Other | 21 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 7% |
Other | 38 | 14% |
Unknown | 94 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 78 | 29% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 10% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 2% |
Other | 32 | 12% |
Unknown | 102 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2024.
All research outputs
#542,080
of 26,571,961 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#883
of 13,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,878
of 340,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 275 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,571,961 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,245 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 275 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.