↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Trifluoperazine versus low-potency first-generation antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
Title
Trifluoperazine versus low-potency first-generation antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009396.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Magdolna Tardy, Markus Dold, Rolf R Engel, Stefan Leucht

Abstract

Antipsychotic drugs are the core treatment for schizophrenia. Treatment guidelines state that there is no difference in efficacy between any other antipsychotic compounds, however, low-potency antipsychotic drugs are often perceived as less efficacious than high-potency compounds by clinicians, and they also seem to differ in their side-effects.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Unknown 87 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 18%
Student > Bachelor 15 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 15%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 16 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 28%
Psychology 15 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 8%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 24 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,897,596
of 18,771,444 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,443
of 11,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,722
of 221,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#101
of 236 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,771,444 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,857 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 236 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.