↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Non‐nutritive sucking for gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease in preterm and low birth weight infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
Title
Non‐nutritive sucking for gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease in preterm and low birth weight infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009817.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kim Psaila, Jann P Foster, Robyn Richards, Heather E Jeffery

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 136 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 12%
Researcher 12 9%
Other 10 7%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 45 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 15%
Social Sciences 10 7%
Psychology 3 2%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 52 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2017.
All research outputs
#7,333,477
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,836
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,483
of 268,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#184
of 254 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 254 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.