↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Non‐nutritive sucking for gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease in preterm and low birth weight infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
Title
Non‐nutritive sucking for gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease in preterm and low birth weight infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009817.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kim Psaila, Jann P Foster, Robyn Richards, Heather E Jeffery

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 134 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 13%
Student > Master 17 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 12%
Researcher 12 9%
Other 10 7%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 40 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 16%
Social Sciences 9 7%
Unspecified 5 4%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 47 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2017.
All research outputs
#5,165,207
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,085
of 11,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,633
of 268,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#145
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,482 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,067 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.