↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Non-nutritive sucking for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in preterm and low birth weight infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
Title
Non-nutritive sucking for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in preterm and low birth weight infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009817.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kim Psaila, Jann P Foster, Robyn Richards, Heather E Jeffery

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 109 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 16%
Student > Master 17 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 14%
Researcher 11 10%
Other 8 7%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 25 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 19%
Social Sciences 9 8%
Psychology 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 32 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2017.
All research outputs
#2,110,832
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,557
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,268
of 212,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#127
of 232 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 232 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.