| Title |
Interventions for managing asthma in pregnancy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010660.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emily Bain, Kristen L Pierides, Vicki L Clifton, Nicolette A Hodyl, Michael J Stark, Caroline A Crowther, Philippa Middleton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 16% |
| Spain | 3 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 16% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 11% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Argentina | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 79% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 16% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 597 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 592 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 100 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 67 | 11% |
| Researcher | 58 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 29 | 5% |
| Other | 89 | 15% |
| Unknown | 205 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 174 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 73 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 29 | 5% |
| Psychology | 28 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 18 | 3% |
| Other | 53 | 9% |
| Unknown | 222 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2023.
All research outputs
#2,400,771
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,918
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,877
of 273,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#108
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.