↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Vaccines for preventing malaria (blood-stage)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
Title
Vaccines for preventing malaria (blood-stage)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2006
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006199
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patricia M Graves, Hellen Gelband

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
France 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 119 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 18%
Researcher 19 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Other 9 7%
Other 29 23%
Unknown 17 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 6%
Unspecified 6 5%
Other 32 26%
Unknown 21 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2012.
All research outputs
#5,299,791
of 16,610,725 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,996
of 11,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,129
of 235,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#197
of 241 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,610,725 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,539 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 241 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.