↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for dysphagia in oesophageal cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
161 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
317 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for dysphagia in oesophageal cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005048.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yingxue Dai, Chaoying Li, Yao Xie, Xudong Liu, Jianxin Zhang, Jing Zhou, Xiongfei Pan, Shujuan Yang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 317 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 313 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 62 20%
Student > Bachelor 31 10%
Researcher 27 9%
Other 26 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 7%
Other 48 15%
Unknown 101 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 106 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 9%
Psychology 15 5%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 2%
Other 34 11%
Unknown 117 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2017.
All research outputs
#4,947,179
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,263
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,738
of 275,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#145
of 250 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 250 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.