↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for dysphagia in oesophageal cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
143 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
263 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for dysphagia in oesophageal cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005048.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chao Yang, Jing Li, Wenguang Fu, Weiwei Xu, Shujuan Yang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 263 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 259 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 57 22%
Researcher 26 10%
Other 24 9%
Student > Bachelor 24 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 8%
Other 44 17%
Unknown 67 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 99 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 9%
Psychology 14 5%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 2%
Other 31 12%
Unknown 81 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2017.
All research outputs
#3,692,381
of 21,321,610 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,171
of 12,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,063
of 252,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#132
of 236 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,321,610 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 236 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.