↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for dysphagia in oesophageal cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
224 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for dysphagia in oesophageal cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005048.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chao Yang, Jing Li, Wenguang Fu, Weiwei Xu, Shujuan Yang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 220 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 23%
Researcher 24 11%
Student > Bachelor 21 9%
Other 21 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 8%
Other 45 20%
Unknown 43 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 94 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 10%
Psychology 12 5%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Other 31 14%
Unknown 53 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2017.
All research outputs
#3,004,008
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,334
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,876
of 229,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#150
of 222 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,130 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 222 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.