↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for dysphagia in oesophageal cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
158 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
311 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for dysphagia in oesophageal cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005048.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yingxue Dai, Chaoying Li, Yao Xie, Xudong Liu, Jianxin Zhang, Jing Zhou, Xiongfei Pan, Shujuan Yang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 311 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 307 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 60 19%
Student > Bachelor 31 10%
Other 26 8%
Researcher 26 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 7%
Other 45 14%
Unknown 101 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 105 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 9%
Psychology 15 5%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 2%
Other 31 10%
Unknown 117 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2017.
All research outputs
#4,700,145
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,024
of 13,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,188
of 276,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#143
of 249 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 249 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.