↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for psychosexual dysfunction in women treated for gynaecological malignancy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for psychosexual dysfunction in women treated for gynaecological malignancy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004708.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul Flynn, Fiona Kew, Steve R Kisely

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 126 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 13%
Researcher 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 26 20%
Unknown 34 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 16%
Psychology 18 14%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 35 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2020.
All research outputs
#5,934,555
of 18,197,021 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,251
of 11,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,025
of 240,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#198
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,197,021 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.