↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for psychosexual dysfunction in women treated for gynaecological malignancy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for psychosexual dysfunction in women treated for gynaecological malignancy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004708.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul Flynn, Fiona Kew, Steve R Kisely

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 158 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 11%
Researcher 12 8%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 39 24%
Unknown 52 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 16%
Psychology 19 12%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Unspecified 6 4%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 54 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2020.
All research outputs
#7,447,530
of 22,768,097 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,942
of 12,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,014
of 93,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#37
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,768,097 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,769 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.