↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Gonadotropin‐releasing hormone agonist versus HCG for oocyte triggering in antagonist‐assisted reproductive technology

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
310 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
350 Mendeley
Title
Gonadotropin‐releasing hormone agonist versus HCG for oocyte triggering in antagonist‐assisted reproductive technology
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008046.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohamed AFM Youssef, Fulco Van der Veen, Hesham G Al‐Inany, Monique H Mochtar, Georg Griesinger, Mohamed Nagi Mohesen, Ismail Aboulfoutouh, Madelon van Wely

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 350 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Ukraine 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Unknown 346 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 43 12%
Student > Master 42 12%
Researcher 38 11%
Student > Bachelor 37 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 8%
Other 73 21%
Unknown 89 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 138 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 3%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Other 36 10%
Unknown 114 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2021.
All research outputs
#2,069,708
of 25,376,646 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,424
of 13,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,181
of 268,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#94
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,376,646 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,057 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.