| Title |
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist versus HCG for oocyte triggering in antagonist-assisted reproductive technology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008046.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mohamed AFM Youssef, Fulco Van der Veen, Hesham G Al-Inany, Monique H Mochtar, Georg Griesinger, Mohamed Nagi Mohesen, Ismail Aboulfoutouh, Madelon van Wely |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 25% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 343 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Ukraine | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 339 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 42 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 41 | 12% |
| Researcher | 38 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 8% |
| Other | 70 | 20% |
| Unknown | 88 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 136 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 33 | 10% |
| Unknown | 113 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,865,743
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,172
of 12,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,439
of 262,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#93
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.