↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Colony-stimulating factors for chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
11 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
221 Mendeley
Title
Colony-stimulating factors for chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003039.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rahul Mhaskar, Otavio Augusto Camara Clark, Gary Lyman, Tobias Engel Ayer Botrel, Luciano Morganti Paladini, Benjamin Djulbegovic

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 219 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 16%
Student > Bachelor 27 12%
Other 27 12%
Researcher 24 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 8%
Other 48 22%
Unknown 42 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 105 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 2%
Other 18 8%
Unknown 53 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,379,064
of 18,047,439 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,450
of 11,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,708
of 240,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#89
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,047,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,811 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.