↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Colony-stimulating factors for chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
13 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
270 Mendeley
Title
Colony-stimulating factors for chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003039.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rahul Mhaskar, Otavio Augusto Camara Clark, Gary Lyman, Tobias Engel Ayer Botrel, Luciano Morganti Paladini, Benjamin Djulbegovic

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 268 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 14%
Other 32 12%
Researcher 29 11%
Student > Bachelor 28 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 6%
Other 58 21%
Unknown 67 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 118 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 17 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Other 23 9%
Unknown 77 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,433,825
of 22,896,955 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,282
of 12,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,756
of 260,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#84
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,896,955 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,677 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.