↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
768 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
260 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003145.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wolfgang Schwenk, Oliver Haase, Jens J. Neudecker, Joachim M Müller

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 260 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 252 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 14%
Researcher 36 14%
Student > Master 29 11%
Student > Postgraduate 28 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 8%
Other 70 27%
Unknown 40 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 156 60%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Unspecified 4 2%
Other 26 10%
Unknown 52 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2019.
All research outputs
#5,240,968
of 16,444,877 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,948
of 11,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,122
of 235,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#200
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,444,877 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,489 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,772 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.