↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
893 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
367 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003145.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wolfgang Schwenk, Oliver Haase, Jens J. Neudecker, Joachim M Müller

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 367 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 359 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 12%
Researcher 43 12%
Student > Master 35 10%
Student > Postgraduate 34 9%
Student > Bachelor 28 8%
Other 84 23%
Unknown 99 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 187 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 3%
Engineering 7 2%
Unspecified 5 1%
Other 33 9%
Unknown 111 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2019.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,054
of 11,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,455
of 69,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#31
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,707 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.