↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for the treatment of borderline ovarian tumours

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Readers on

mendeley
204 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Interventions for the treatment of borderline ovarian tumours
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007696.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olusola Faluyi, Melanie Mackean, Charlie Gourley, Andrew Bryant, Heather O Dickinson

Timeline
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 203 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 15%
Student > Bachelor 19 9%
Researcher 18 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Student > Postgraduate 13 6%
Other 36 18%
Unknown 75 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 79 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 7%
Psychology 10 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 77 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2023.
All research outputs
#5,786,085
of 26,557,909 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,831
of 13,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,932
of 108,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#53
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,557,909 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,245 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,847 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.