↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Cytoreductive surgery plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Cytoreductive surgery plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007822.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Khadra Galaal, Raj Naik, Robert E Bristow, Amit Patel, Andrew Bryant, Heather O Dickinson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Unknown 108 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Researcher 11 10%
Professor 6 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 41 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 43 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2023.
All research outputs
#8,850,931
of 26,150,873 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,772
of 13,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,239
of 99,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#48
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,150,873 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.