| Title |
Interventions for primary prevention of suicide in university and other post‐secondary educational settings
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009439.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Curtis S Harrod, Cynthia W Goss, Lorann Stallones, Carolyn DiGuiseppi |
| Abstract |
Suicide is a leading cause of death among post-secondary students worldwide. Suicidal thoughts and planning are common among post-secondary students. Previous reviews have examined the effectiveness of interventions for symptomatic individuals; however, many students at high risk of suicide are undiagnosed and untreated. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 40% |
| Ireland | 1 | 20% |
| Australia | 1 | 20% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 569 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 564 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 83 | 15% |
| Researcher | 74 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 66 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 66 | 12% |
| Other | 35 | 6% |
| Other | 105 | 18% |
| Unknown | 140 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 123 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 110 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 64 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 42 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 11 | 2% |
| Other | 58 | 10% |
| Unknown | 161 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2018.
All research outputs
#3,119,052
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,768
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,183
of 274,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#120
of 245 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 245 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.