↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Astragalus (a traditional Chinese medicine) for treating chronic kidney disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
9 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
234 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Astragalus (a traditional Chinese medicine) for treating chronic kidney disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008369.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hong Wei Zhang, Zhi Xiu Lin, Chuanshan Xu, Connie Leung, Lai Sum Chan

Abstract

Astragalus (Radix Astragali, huang qi) is the dried root of Astragalus membranaceus (Fisch.) Bge. var. mongholicus (Bge.) Hsiao or Astragalus membranaceus (Fisch.) Bge. (Family Leguminosae). It is one of the most widely used herbs in traditional Chinese medicine for treating kidney diseases. Evidence is needed to help clinicians and patients make judgments about its use for managing chronic kidney disease (CKD).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 234 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 35 15%
Student > Master 28 12%
Researcher 21 9%
Unspecified 20 9%
Other 17 7%
Other 45 19%
Unknown 68 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 29%
Unspecified 20 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 4%
Other 30 13%
Unknown 78 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,524,278
of 25,982,087 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,120
of 13,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,787
of 274,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#67
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,982,087 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,171 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.