↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Specialist breast care nurses for supportive care of women with breast cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
212 Mendeley
Title
Specialist breast care nurses for supportive care of women with breast cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005634.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susanne Cruickshank, Catriona Kennedy, Karen Lockhart, Isabel Dosser, Lorraine Dallas

Abstract

Breast Care Nurses (BCNs) are now established internationally, predominantly in well resourced healthcare systems. The role of BCNs has expanded to reflect the diversity of the population in which they work, and the improvements in survival of women with breast cancer. Interventions by BCNs aim to support women and help them cope with the impact of the disease on their quality of life.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 209 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 43 20%
Student > Master 31 15%
Researcher 21 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 9%
Other 15 7%
Other 41 19%
Unknown 41 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 67 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 52 25%
Psychology 12 6%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Other 23 11%
Unknown 47 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2014.
All research outputs
#10,575,965
of 16,520,485 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,901
of 11,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,056
of 236,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#224
of 250 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,520,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,523 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,906 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 250 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.