The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin for preventing stroke and systemic embolic events among atrial fibrillation patients with chronic kidney disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011373.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Miho Kimachi, Toshi A Furukawa, Kimihiko Kimachi, Yoshihito Goto, Shingo Fukuma, Shunichi Fukuhara |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 11% |
| India | 3 | 5% |
| Turkey | 2 | 4% |
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 39 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 47 | 84% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 13% |
| Scientists | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 379 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 379 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 52 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 51 | 13% |
| Other | 34 | 9% |
| Researcher | 31 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 23 | 6% |
| Other | 70 | 18% |
| Unknown | 118 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 142 | 37% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 32 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 31 | 8% |
| Unknown | 134 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2022.
All research outputs
#935,805
of 26,266,075 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,701
of 13,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,956
of 346,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#45
of 272 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,266,075 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,202 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 272 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.