↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Non-pharmacological interventions for somatoform disorders and medically unexplained physical symptoms (MUPS) in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
37 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
192 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
473 Mendeley
Title
Non-pharmacological interventions for somatoform disorders and medically unexplained physical symptoms (MUPS) in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011142.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nikki van Dessel, Madelon den Boeft, Johannes C van der Wouden, Maria Kleinstäuber, Stephanie S Leone, Berend Terluin, Mattijs E Numans, Henriëtte E van der Horst, Harm van Marwijk

Abstract

Medically unexplained physical symptoms (MUPS) are physical symptoms for which no adequate medical explanation can be found after proper examination. The presence of MUPS is the key feature of conditions known as 'somatoform disorders'. Various psychological and physical therapies have been developed to treat somatoform disorders and MUPS. Although there are several reviews on non-pharmacological interventions for somatoform disorders and MUPS, a complete overview of the whole spectrum is missing.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 473 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 467 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 85 18%
Researcher 69 15%
Student > Bachelor 61 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 41 9%
Other 103 22%
Unknown 58 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 161 34%
Psychology 111 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 42 9%
Social Sciences 23 5%
Neuroscience 17 4%
Other 40 8%
Unknown 79 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2021.
All research outputs
#524,088
of 17,755,171 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,218
of 11,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,028
of 241,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#31
of 251 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,755,171 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,759 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 251 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.