The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Antibiotics for prelabour rupture of membranes at or near term
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001807.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aleena M Wojcieszek, Owen M Stock, Vicki Flenady |
| Abstract |
Prelabour rupture of the membranes (PROM) at or near term (defined in this review as 36 weeks' gestation or beyond) increases the risk of infection for the woman and her baby. The routine use of antibiotics for women at the time of term PROM may reduce this risk. However, due to increasing problems with bacterial resistance and the risk of maternal anaphylaxis with antibiotic use, it is important to assess the evidence addressing risks and benefits in order to ensure judicious use of antibiotics. This review was undertaken to assess the balance of risks and benefits to the mother and infant of antibiotic prophylaxis for PROM at or near term. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
| Japan | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 389 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 383 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 54 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 50 | 13% |
| Researcher | 38 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 29 | 7% |
| Other | 70 | 18% |
| Unknown | 118 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 148 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 46 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 2% |
| Psychology | 9 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 40 | 10% |
| Unknown | 129 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,333,342
of 26,103,952 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,678
of 13,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,683
of 276,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#61
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,103,952 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.