↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Antibiotics for prelabour rupture of membranes at or near term

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
42 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
408 Mendeley
Title
Antibiotics for prelabour rupture of membranes at or near term
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001807.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aleena M Wojcieszek, Owen M Stock, Vicki Flenady

Abstract

Prelabour rupture of the membranes (PROM) at or near term (defined in this review as 36 weeks' gestation or beyond) increases the risk of infection for the woman and her baby. The routine use of antibiotics for women at the time of term PROM may reduce this risk. However, due to increasing problems with bacterial resistance and the risk of maternal anaphylaxis with antibiotic use, it is important to assess the evidence addressing risks and benefits in order to ensure judicious use of antibiotics. This review was undertaken to assess the balance of risks and benefits to the mother and infant of antibiotic prophylaxis for PROM at or near term.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 408 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 402 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 53 13%
Student > Bachelor 51 13%
Researcher 38 9%
Unspecified 33 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 7%
Other 97 24%
Unknown 106 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 147 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 47 12%
Unspecified 33 8%
Social Sciences 9 2%
Psychology 9 2%
Other 47 12%
Unknown 116 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,317,429
of 25,870,940 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,667
of 13,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,642
of 275,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#61
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,940 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.