↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Non‐pharmacological interventions for preventing job loss in workers with inflammatory arthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
16 X users
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
329 Mendeley
Title
Non‐pharmacological interventions for preventing job loss in workers with inflammatory arthritis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010208.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan L Hoving, Diane Lacaille, Donna M Urquhart, Timo J Hannu, Judith K Sluiter, Monique HW Frings‐Dresen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 329 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 325 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 10%
Researcher 31 9%
Student > Bachelor 30 9%
Student > Postgraduate 18 5%
Other 58 18%
Unknown 109 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 89 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 42 13%
Psychology 23 7%
Social Sciences 13 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 2%
Other 33 10%
Unknown 122 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,729,535
of 26,123,112 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,548
of 13,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,424
of 278,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#82
of 258 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,123,112 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,015 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 258 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.