↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Non-pharmacological interventions for preventing job loss in workers with inflammatory arthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
19 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
230 Mendeley
Title
Non-pharmacological interventions for preventing job loss in workers with inflammatory arthritis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010208.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan L Hoving, Diane Lacaille, Donna M Urquhart, Timo J Hannu, Judith K Sluiter, Monique HW Frings-Dresen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 226 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 12%
Researcher 26 11%
Student > Bachelor 25 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 7%
Other 42 18%
Unknown 48 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 73 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 40 17%
Psychology 19 8%
Social Sciences 12 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Other 25 11%
Unknown 56 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2018.
All research outputs
#963,904
of 17,360,236 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,537
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,370
of 240,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#71
of 254 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,360,236 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 254 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.