↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Deep transverse friction massage for treating lateral elbow or lateral knee tendinitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
38 tweeters
facebook
14 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
574 Mendeley
Title
Deep transverse friction massage for treating lateral elbow or lateral knee tendinitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003528.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laurianne M Loew, Lucie Brosseau, Peter Tugwell, George A Wells, Vivian Welch, Beverley Shea, Stephane Poitras, Gino De Angelis, Prinon Rahman

Abstract

Deep transverse friction massage, one of several physical therapy interventions suggested for the management of tendinitis pain, was first demonstrated in the 1930s by Dr James Cyriax, a renowned orthopedic surgeon in England. Its goal is to prevent abnormal fibrous adhesions and abnormal scarring. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2001.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 574 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 569 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 133 23%
Student > Master 93 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 37 6%
Student > Postgraduate 32 6%
Other 90 16%
Unknown 147 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 160 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 138 24%
Sports and Recreations 37 6%
Psychology 18 3%
Social Sciences 9 2%
Other 54 9%
Unknown 158 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2022.
All research outputs
#914,394
of 21,744,520 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,046
of 12,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,912
of 253,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#51
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,744,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,100 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.