↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Deep transverse friction massage for treating lateral elbow or lateral knee tendinitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
42 X users
facebook
14 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
662 Mendeley
Title
Deep transverse friction massage for treating lateral elbow or lateral knee tendinitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003528.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laurianne M Loew, Lucie Brosseau, Peter Tugwell, George A Wells, Vivian Welch, Beverley Shea, Stephane Poitras, Gino De Angelis, Prinon Rahman

Abstract

Deep transverse friction massage, one of several physical therapy interventions suggested for the management of tendinitis pain, was first demonstrated in the 1930s by Dr James Cyriax, a renowned orthopedic surgeon in England. Its goal is to prevent abnormal fibrous adhesions and abnormal scarring. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2001.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 662 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 657 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 136 21%
Student > Master 100 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 38 6%
Researcher 34 5%
Other 117 18%
Unknown 193 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 161 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 144 22%
Sports and Recreations 43 6%
Unspecified 26 4%
Psychology 20 3%
Other 64 10%
Unknown 204 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,084,114
of 25,380,459 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,219
of 13,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,021
of 271,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#48
of 258 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,380,459 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,019 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 258 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.