↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
70 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
532 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1237 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010820.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alex Pollock, Sybil E Farmer, Marian C Brady, Peter Langhorne, Gillian E Mead, Jan Mehrholz, Frederike van Wijck

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 70 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 1216 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 220 18%
Student > Bachelor 200 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 124 10%
Researcher 114 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 65 5%
Other 205 17%
Unknown 309 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 248 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 241 19%
Neuroscience 102 8%
Engineering 72 6%
Psychology 53 4%
Other 163 13%
Unknown 358 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 91. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2019.
All research outputs
#392,533
of 22,770,070 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#719
of 12,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,492
of 258,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,770,070 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.