↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
75 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
401 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1016 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010820.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alex Pollock, Sybil E Farmer, Marian C Brady, Peter Langhorne, Gillian E Mead, Jan Mehrholz, Frederike van Wijck

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 75 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,016 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 996 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 194 19%
Student > Bachelor 177 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 112 11%
Researcher 102 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 58 6%
Other 188 19%
Unknown 185 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 226 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 217 21%
Neuroscience 91 9%
Engineering 63 6%
Psychology 47 5%
Other 151 15%
Unknown 221 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 94. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2019.
All research outputs
#257,096
of 17,065,319 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#536
of 11,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,881
of 237,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 252 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,065,319 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,629 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,378 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 252 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.