↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
60 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
672 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1475 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010820.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alex Pollock, Sybil E Farmer, Marian C Brady, Peter Langhorne, Gillian E Mead, Jan Mehrholz, Frederike van Wijck

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,475 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 1454 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 240 16%
Student > Bachelor 217 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 132 9%
Researcher 120 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 73 5%
Other 231 16%
Unknown 462 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 271 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 258 17%
Neuroscience 109 7%
Engineering 87 6%
Psychology 56 4%
Other 181 12%
Unknown 513 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2019.
All research outputs
#505,940
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#887
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,287
of 271,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 257 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 257 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.