↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Antibiotics for meconium‐stained amniotic fluid in labour for preventing maternal and neonatal infections

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
243 Mendeley
Title
Antibiotics for meconium‐stained amniotic fluid in labour for preventing maternal and neonatal infections
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007772.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thitiporn Siriwachirachai, Ussanee S Sangkomkamhang, Pisake Lumbiganon, Malinee Laopaiboon

Abstract

Chorioamnionitis is more likely to occur when meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) is present. Meconium may enhance the growth of bacteria in amniotic fluid by serving as a growth factor, inhibiting bacteriostatic properties of amniotic fluid. Many adverse neonatal outcomes related to MSAF result from meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS). MSAF is associated with both maternal and newborn infections. Antibiotics may be an effective option to reduce such morbidity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 241 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 35 14%
Student > Master 33 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 7%
Researcher 16 7%
Student > Postgraduate 16 7%
Other 43 18%
Unknown 83 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 38 16%
Psychology 9 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Other 23 9%
Unknown 85 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2023.
All research outputs
#4,660,035
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,805
of 11,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,820
of 276,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#143
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,483 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.