↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Psychological, social and welfare interventions for psychological health and well-being of torture survivors

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
730 Mendeley
Title
Psychological, social and welfare interventions for psychological health and well-being of torture survivors
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009317.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nimisha Patel, Blerina Kellezi, Amanda C de C Williams

Abstract

Torture is widespread, with potentially broad and long-lasting impact across physical, psychological, social and other areas of life. Its complex and diverse effects interact with ethnicity, gender, and refugee experience. Health and welfare agencies offer varied rehabilitation services, from conventional mental health treatment to eclectic or needs-based interventions. This review is needed because relatively little outcome research has been done in this field, and no previous systematic review has been conducted. Resources are scarce, and the challenges of providing services can be considerable.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 730 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 720 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 145 20%
Researcher 108 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 85 12%
Student > Bachelor 74 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 65 9%
Other 122 17%
Unknown 131 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 181 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 164 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 75 10%
Social Sciences 58 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 2%
Other 74 10%
Unknown 164 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2019.
All research outputs
#3,841,785
of 15,329,269 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,322
of 11,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,598
of 232,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#166
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,329,269 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,167 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.